> On 13 Jan 2016, at 21:53, Fabrice Jammes <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Good news, John has finished its job on the cluster, so we don't need no more to setup ccqserv{100..124}.
> So could you please try to upgrade kernel on ccqserv{125...149}, and then John could try to launch again its code and see if it still produce kernel panic.
Just to be sure... Kernel upgrade on ccqserv{100..124} or on ccqserv{125..149}?
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the QSERV-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=QSERV-L&A=1
