Print

Print


Hello All,

I’ve just committed a new detector which uses Pelle’s latest geometry and adds the

fieldmap for 2.3GeV running. It is:

 

HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap

 

and uses the fieldmap which can be found here:

 

http://www.lcsim.org/resources/hps/fieldmap/209acm2_5kg_corrected_unfolded_scaled_1.04545.dat

 

Download this file into a fieldmap subdirectory or provide a link there.

Please let me know if you have any questions or encounter any difficulties.

Norman

 

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bradley T Yale
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 8:22 AM
To: Hansson Adrian, Per Ola; Holly Vance
Cc: hps-software
Subject: Re: Detector for upcoming run

 

Thanks,

 

Can these be used for 2.3 GeV, or would the fieldmap be a better option for that energy?

 

Brad

 

 


From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 2:19 AM
To: Holly Vance
Cc: hps-software
Subject: Re: Detector for upcoming run

 

Hi all, again,

 

I added LCDD files for these. 

 

NOTE:  if you run readout/recon with these you need to run with the database alignment constants DISABLED. If you don’t know what that means talk to me or Sho directly. 

 

Cheers,

Pelle

 

 

On Feb 1, 2016, at 11:12 PM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



 

Hi,

 

I added new detectors for a couple of opening angles we would imagine running monitoring at.

 

HPS-PhysicsRun2016-*v4-4

 

The SVT alignment is the same as HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v3-4-fieldmap.

 

The ECal is based on the HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap.

 

The B-field was set to 0.5T and we are not using the field map for these.

 

 

/Pelle

 

 

 

 

On Feb 1, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Holly Vance <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



Also, I'll check on the new detector you submit, but the Ecal part should be from v4-4. 

 

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Holly Vance <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi Pelle, Norman,

 

Yes, that's great. We will use this to generate singles1 calibration for the next run. 

 

Thanks!

Holly

 

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Hansson Adrian, Per Ola <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 

Hi Holly,

 

I have some new detectors. Let me look at something real quick and then commit and you can take a look if this is what you want. 1.5h?

 

/Pelle

 

 

 

On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Holly Vance <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 

Hi,

 

We are ready to generate monte carlo that we can use for Ecal calibration, but I am wondering if we have a new detector available that has a B-field corresponding to 2.3 GeV running. Is anyone working on this? I think just a new field map is needed. 

 

It really won't make much of a difference for looking at FEE at the Ecal only, but since we are going to generate this MC and others may want to use it, we should make it accurate. 

 

-Holly

 


Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

 


NOTE: This message was trained as non-spam. If this is wrong, please correct the training as soon as possible.
Spam
Not spam
Forget previous vote

 

 

 

 


Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

 


Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

 


Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1



Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1