Sho, Can you check runs: 7488 7490 7486 7487 7492 7494 7807 7808 7809 ? These are the runs to study different current settings. Thanks you, Valery ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sho Uemura" <[log in to unmask]> > To: "Valery Kubarovsky" <[log in to unmask]> > Cc: "Bradley T Yale" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, > [log in to unmask], "Sebouh Paul" <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:25:42 AM > Subject: Re: Drastic difference between 7487 and 7807. > I think this is from a change in conditions DB constants (SVT phase > offset) for the SVT. This is a number that can change depending on the > run, and has to be filled in after the run by looking at the data. The > value for run 7487 has been correct since 2/25. I set the value for 7807 > on Wednesday (and I changed the default value to something that matches > most of the runs we have taken). > > Maybe your 7807 DQM was run after the change, and the 7487 DQM was run > before. Rerunning recon and DQM will fix it. > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Valery Kubarovsky wrote: > >> Hi All: >> Please take a look to runs 7807 (3/7/2016) and 7487 (2/21/2016). >> The trigger is almost the same, the current 200 nA. >> It looks like the number of reconstructed tracks is almost factor of 5 higher >> the last weekend than two weeks ago. Can somebody tell me what is the reason? >> Thanks, >> Valery >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bradley T Yale" <[log in to unmask]> >>> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, >>> "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, >>> "Sebouh Paul" <[log in to unmask]> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 7:06:17 PM >>> Subject: Too few Pass6 Moller events in MC >> >>> I know this was supposed to be the "final pass", >>> >>> but it looks like there are far too few Moller events being readout in Pass 6 >>> Monte Carlo. >>> >>> >>> Looking further into this, it is because the >3-hit clusters in Pass 6 are >>> getting decimated BEFORE the trigger for some reason (see attached plots), and >>> so they no longer pass the cluster hit count threshold. These were made using >>> exactly the same filtered SLIC events, and the same steering file with the same >>> apparent thresholds in the GTP clusterer and trigger. >>> >>> The difference must be elsewhere in the drivers themselves. >>> >>> >>> These plots compare >>> >>> hps-distribution-3.5-20151218.205540-15-bin.jar >>> >>> with >>> >>> hps-distribution-3.6-bin.jar >>> >>> >>> both using the 'EngineeringRun2015TrigSingles1_Pass2.lcsim' steering file. >>> >>> >>> A more recent 3.5 jar (1/25/2016) gives a similar number of events as Pass 4, >>> and so the key difference must be with 3.6. >>> >>> >>> -Brad >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >>> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 >> >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1