 |
 |
Need more specifics to help... What command are you running and what's the traceback? What is the hps-java version? (trunk?) Since the new ECal detector model is not used in any of the existing detectors, I'm pretty sure that's not the problem here. :) -----Original Message----- From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathan Baltzell Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:19 AM To: Alessandra Filippi Cc: hps-software Subject: Re: which version of hps-java to run with nominal geometry Hi Alessandra, If the problem you have is only with ecal reconstruction but you only need tracking, one immediate temporary fix could be to turn off ecal reconstruction. Comparing HPS-Engrun2015-v0/1 with the more recent detectors, looks like the ecal model is the same, just different y-offsets. Can you post the full error messages? Does Kyle remember what he did to work around this problem previously? -Nathan On May 31, 2016, at 12:25, Alessandra Filippi <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi all, > I have a potentially stupid issue which is blocking me since a few days. > I want to make some simple tests on geometry and simple millepede > behavior (to understands systematics in a starting situation) and need > to run the reconstruction on some mc data using a plain nominal > geometry, say > HPS-EngRun2015-v1 (or v0). > I have updated the hps-java code but I am not able to run the reconstruction with any lcsim file as I always get an error on Ecal.ClusterEnergy, that was an issue already noted by Kyle once ago and was related to a different geometry version expected for Ecal by the newest code, if I understood correctly. Right? > So... since with the updates I lost track of the hps-java version I > used when running the tracking with nominal geometry, does anyone recall which is the latest hps-java version that must be run in this case? > > Or, to be backward (or forward) compatible, would it be very wrong to create a new hybrid "v0" (say 2016) with nominal svt geometry parameters and the newest ones for the Ecal? Of course I can always disable SvtAlignmentConstants and reconstruct with a nominal SVT geometry, but I need to run slic also, so I need to produce the proper lcdd file as well. > Any suggestion is welcome. > Thanks, cheers > Alessandra > > ###################################################################### > ## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1