Print

Print


Hi Andy,

On 9/2/16 2:27 PM, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote:
> Hi Marian,
>
> I see that the cluster configuration for cmsxrootd.fnal.gov is:
>
> 0: [::ffff:129.93.239.131] xrootd.unl.edu v4.3.0
> 1: [::ffff:131.225.204.174] cmsxrootd1.fnal.gov v4.3.0-rc3
> 2: [2600:900:6:1101:5054:ff:fe00:70cb] xrootd.unl.edu v4.3.0

which goofer you used get this info? Let me learn something here, please.

This is actually problem now with global redirectors, too. They have v6 
active interface and everyone using CMSSW now against global redirecotr 
cms-xrd-global.cern.ch hit this. We're not sure whether this is some 
coincidence or not with lxplus, but it's very weird because global 
redirector is on dual-stack for long time and noone noticed any issues 
until couple days ago when we put in EU regional level of redirection 
dual-stack host (xrootd-cms-redir-01.cr.cnaf.infn.it). Today we've taken 
it out, but problem for users is still there for this particular 
"dual-stack: false" reason.

> Any particular reason why the fnal one is not on a supported version of
> xrootd? In any case, I will look to see if we addressed this issue in
> 4.4.0.

not in OSG repo yet, just created OSG SW JIRA ticket update package to 
4.4.0. FNAL is still in -rc3, yeah, I need to ping them. Let me know if 
you find this fixed in 4.4.0, that'll be great.

> In the mean time, could you do:
>
> xrdfs cmsxrootd.fnal.gov:1094 locate -h <the_problem_path>
>
> and return the result to me? I can't do it as it appears you have turned
> on access control for the locate command.

looks like I'm blocked, too (with my proxy):
$ xrdfs cmsxrootd.fnal.gov:1094 locate -h 
/store/mc/RunIISpring16reHLT80/DYJetsToLL_M-50_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/AODSIM/PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14-v1/40000/003A70D5-E55C-E611-9B14-0025905C53A8.root 

[ERROR] Server responded with an error: [3010] Unable to locate 
/store/mc/RunIISpring16reHLT80/DYJetsToLL_M-50_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/AODSIM/PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14-v1/40000/003A70D5-E55C-E611-9B14-0025905C53A8.root; 
permission denied

Where is this control configurable, on which level and what knobs, please?

Thanks,
Marian

> Andy
>
> B.T.W Version 4.4.0 is much better than 4.3.0 so you should consider
> upgrading.
>
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Marian Zvada wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> We're experiencing issues with older clients vs redirector IPv6
> enabled where client host is dual-stack. Relevant piece of behavior is
> from the log as follows:
>>
>> `[2016-09-02 19:40:10.529888 +0200][Debug ][XRootDTransport ]
> [cmsxrootd.fnal.gov:1094 #0.0] Sending out kXR_login request, username:
> zvada, cgi: ?xrd.cc=ch&xrd.tz=1&xrd.appname=xrdcp&xrd.info=, dual-stack:
> false`
>> ...
>> ...
>> ```
>> [2016-09-02 19:41:00.221320 +0200][Debug ][File ]
> [0x2000000@root://cmsxrootd.fnal.gov:1094//store/mc/RunIISpring16reHLT80/DYJetsToLL_M-50_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/AODSIM/PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14-v1/40000/003A70D5-E55C-E611-9B14-0025905C53A8.root]
> Error while opening at cms-xrd-transit.cern.ch:1094: [ERROR] Server
> responded with an error: [3011] No servers are available to read the file.
>> [0B/0B][100%][==================================================][0B/s]
>> Run: [ERROR] Server responded with an error: [3011] No servers are
> available to read the file.
>> $ xrdcp -version
>> v4.0.4
>> ```
>> Forcing XRD_NETWORKSTACK=IPv4 solve the issue on client side, though:
>> ```
>> $ XRD_NETWORKSTACK=IPv4 xrdcp -f
> root://cmsxrootd.fnal.gov//store/mc/RunIISpring16reHLT80/DYJetsToLL_M-50_TuneCUETP8M1_13TeV-amcatnloFXFX-pythia8/AODSIM/PUSpring16RAWAODSIM_reHLT_80X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v14-v1/40000/003A70D5-E55C-E611-9B14-0025905C53A8.root
> /dev/null
>> [80MB/3.495GB][ 2%][=> ][8.889MB/s]
>> $ xrdcp -version
>> v4.0.4
>> ```
>> Suggestion is provide on the server side a configuration parameter to
> force dual-stack to true - we'd assume that IPv4 is always present.
> Clients >=v4.3.x handle dual-stack situation well, but for users running
> anything below that would be preferable be cautions and act on the
> server side with config tweak if possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Marian
>>
>> --
>> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/411
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/411#issuecomment-244466567>, or
> mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFfkqjI-5tU0e3_SDAUAZowJ6QnHFKy1ks5qmHiFgaJpZM4Jz8WB>.
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/411#issuecomment-244491450
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1