 |
 |
If it reduces the size by only 2%, I don't see a reason to drop seed tracks from the recon. There are other SVT related collections that likely have a bigger contribution to the recon file size that we can discuss removing at the next software meeting. We can also discuss changing ReconParticleDriver so that it only processes GBL tracks. On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Sebouh Paul <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I have talked with Nathan and Rafo about this, and we'd like to get the > SVT experts' opinion on it. It seems that nobody is using the seed tracks > for any of their analyses. As it is, we have separate copies of each final > state particle, vertex and moller for the GBL tracks versus for the seed > tracks. I had thought that by making the seed tracks transient (ie, not > stored in the output files), we would greatly reduce the file size by about > 30% or so, but it turns out that it only lowers the output file sizes by > 2%. I am surprised this isn't a larger fraction and this is hardly a large > enough change to justify removing it. Are there other things associated > with the seed tracks that could be made transient as well, such as > residuals or HelicalTrackHits? > > > ------------------------------ > > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1