 |
 |
Hi Petr, Sorry for the late response! I'm rather sceptical since this type of adapter employs synchronous calls, which are discouraged due to performance reasons. It also adds maintenance costs of another public header. (although I agree it looks rather neat ;-) For now I'll close it, as there was no interested in this issue. Thanks, Michal -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/412#issuecomment-281710492 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1