CRLCheck = 1 is supposed to implement the standard behaviour, i.e. "use if present". This means that a missing CRL should nor be considers an error. But it also means that a present but expired CRL should trigger an error. The code still treats a missing and an expired CRL the same. Now it accept both instead of rejecting both as it did before, but it should accept a missing CRL while rejecting an expired one.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/xrootd/xrootd","title":"xrootd/xrootd","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@ellert in #467: CRLCheck = 1 is supposed to implement the standard behaviour, i.e. \"use if present\". This means that a missing CRL should nor be considers an error. But it also means that a present but expired CRL should trigger an error. The code still treats a missing and an expired CRL the same. Now it accept both instead of rejecting both as it did before, but it should accept a missing CRL while rejecting an expired one.\r\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/467#issuecomment-282394106"}}}
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
