Well, it is not reverting this patch that makes ATLAS data unavailable. Fixing #465 puts makes 4.5.0 and stable-4.6.x behaving exactly the same for what relates to loading-a-CRL-for-an-hash-without-.0 .
The question whether to accept an hash without '.0' should be addressed at a different level in the code.
I am doing that now. This will most likely include reversion of patch be89136 .


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/xrootd/xrootd","title":"xrootd/xrootd","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@gganis in #464: Well, it is not reverting this patch that makes ATLAS data unavailable. Fixing #465 puts makes 4.5.0 and stable-4.6.x behaving exactly the same for what relates to loading-a-CRL-for-an-hash-without-.0 .\r\nThe question whether to accept an hash without '.0' should be addressed at a different level in the code.\r\nI am doing that now. This will most likely include reversion of patch be89136 .\r\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/464#issuecomment-281296683"}}}

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1