2.3 GeV data recon speed is x2 slower than the 1.05 data recon speed.
This is concerning, but maybe there is a good reason for that, i.e.
might be hit occupancies are high etc,
but the other thing, that seems puzzling, is recon speed for 2.3 GeV
data is now more than x2 slower
using the same hps-java version, same detector, same java version, as we
did for pass0.
Rafo
On 05/22/2017 03:10 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas wrote:
>
> Sorry to ask a dumb question…but I will anyway.
>
> This is a “2.3 GeV vs 1.05 GeV” issue? Or an hps-java version issue?
>
>> On May 22, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Omar Moreno <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Jeremy has also profiled the recon before so if Maurik can't do it,
>> I'm sure he can.
>>
>> On May 22, 2017 11:46 AM, "Rafayel Paremuzyan" <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alessandra and all,
>>
>> Yes clearly I see that pattern as well,
>> going to the faster machine (pumpkin1), as Maurik suggested,
>> recon speed increased, but 2016 recon was about x2 slower than
>> the 2015 recon speed.
>> I also tried to with -Xms=4000m -Xmx=4000m options, and without
>> that options,
>> but I didn't notice noticeable speed improvement.
>>
>> Another thing that is *concering* is I run
>> same jar on batch farms, centos6. and centos7, and
>> can't get same speed as we got during the pass0.
>> Note, jar is the same, detector is the same, run number and file
>> number is the same.
>> Difference is the time when it started to tun (Oct 19 2016 vs May
>> 21 2017)
>>
>> If someone is interested to look at job log files
>> The log file that I run yesterday:
>> /lustre/expphy/work/hallb/hps/data/physrun2016/tpass1/logs/hps_008054.27_pass0XML.err
>> The log file that run on Oct 19 2016 for pass0
>> /lustre/expphy/work/hallb/hps/data/physrun2016/pass0/logs/hps_008054.27_R3.9.err
>>
>> I have never done profiling with java.
>> I know Maurik is in workshop, he might not have time to do this,
>> if someone else is set up doing this, it will probably be useful.
>>
>> Also, I noticed /group/hps is full
>>
>> Has anyone recently put some data there?
>>
>> Rafo
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/22/2017 04:04 AM, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maurik, Rafo and all,
>> I think that the different Java VM could impact on the
>> absolute speed comparing different machines and jar versions
>> compiled in different times... but I am running the same jar
>> (hps-java 3.10, compiled afresh at slac on rhel6-64, jvm
>> 1.7.0) on 2015 and 2016 data, and the factor ~2 of speed
>> decrease for newer data is striking (whichever geometry version).
>> About garbage collection, I don't use any flag in
>> compilation, so it acts in default mode in both cases.
>>
>> Are 2016 data affected by more noisy hits that could extend
>> the reconstruction time over testing all different
>> strategies, to your knowledge?
>> cheers
>> Alessandra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 21 May 2017, Maurik Holtrop wrote:
>>
>> Hello Rafo,
>> One thing that probably is different between the last
>> time we ran with the 3.8 jar and now
>> is a different version of the Java VM. It could well be
>> that the newer version of Java is
>> not faster. Also, it is tricky to compare Endeavour with
>> the Jlab farm computers. They are
>> probably not equivalent in speed. At UNH, Pumpkin has the
>> more modern processors, whereas
>> Endeavour is now ~5 years old.
>>
>> Best,
>> Maurik
>>
>> On May 21, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Rafayel Paremuzyan
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alessandra, Norman, all
>>
>> thank you for replay and your tests.
>>
>> I tested both 2015 and 2016 data using v4-4 detector on
>> UNH computers.
>> I have use 3.8 JAR (the jar for 2015 pass6). 3.9 JAR (the
>> jar for 2016 pass0 recon),
>> and the NEW jar v051717 (the newest jar tag is v051717)
>>
>> Ok, I also noticed that recon of 2015 data is faster that
>> 2016 data.
>> Also seems the new jar is 20% slower than the 3.9 jar for
>> 2016 data, and about 60%
>> slower for 2015 data.
>> now recon speed is about 2.55 EV/S for 2015 data, This is
>> too slow
>> it cause more than 40h for a single file.
>>
>> Ths is summary of code speeds with different jar files
>> V4-4 Detector, UNH (endeavour), 5K events are reconstructed
>>
>> Events per second
>> Events per second
>> Events per second
>>
>> 3.8JAR (2015 recon jar)
>> 3.9JAR, 2016 pass0 recon jar
>> v051717JAR, jar vor tpass1
>> 2015 Data 5772, file 20
>> 5.07
>> 5.19
>> 3.157
>> 2016 Data file 25
>>
>> 3.11
>> 2.53
>>
>> *However* I looked into job Wall times for pass0 recon.
>> The recon speed is more than 7.4 Events/sec, which is
>> about x3 faster than with the
>> new JAR.
>>
>> I again checked *same 3.9 jar*, which is slower again.
>> I don't know why now the code speed is so low!
>>
>>
>> Norman, I have tried the
>> "-DdisableSvtAlignmentConstants", but it didn't work
>>
>> =================The command===============
>> java -XX:+UseSerialGC -cp
>> hps-distribution-3.11-v051717-bin.jar
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio -x
>> /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim -r
>> -d HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-fieldmap_globalAlign -R 7796
>> -DoutputFile=out_7796_0
>> -DdisableSvtAlignmentConstants hps_007796.evio.25 -n 10000
>>
>> ============The error backtrache============
>> 2017-05-21 00:45:39 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio
>> parse :: using steering
>> resource
>> /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim
>> 2017-05-21 00:45:39 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio
>> parse :: set max events to
>> 10000
>> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [INFO] org.hps.rundb.RunManager
>> <init> :: ConnectionParameters {
>> database: hps_run_db_v2, hostname: hpsdb.jlab.org
>> <http://hpsdb.jlab.org/>, password: darkphoton, port: 3306,
>> user: hpsuser }
>> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [CONFIG]
>> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager addVariableDefinition
>> :: outputFile = out_7796_0
>> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [CONFIG] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio
>> parse :: set steering variable:
>> outputFile=out_7796_0
>> 2017-05-21 00:45:48 [SEVERE] org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio
>> parse :: bad variable format:
>> disableSvtAlignmentConstants
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Bad variable format:
>> disableSvtAlignmentConstants
>> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(EvioToLcio.java:393)
>> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(EvioToLcio.java:97)
>>
>> Exception in thread "main"
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Bad variable format:
>> disableSvtAlignmentConstants
>> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(EvioToLcio.java:393)
>> at org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(EvioToLcio.java:97)
>>
>> Rafo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/20/2017 06:17 AM, Alessandra Filippi wrote:
>> Hi Rafo, all,
>> I also noticed that the reconstruction for 2016
>> data is about twice as
>> slow as compared to 2015 (whichever geometry and
>> reconstruction
>> version).
>> This happens when I run the aligned geometry as
>> well as the "current"
>> one (v5.0), and the geometry taken from the db as
>> well (the result is
>> the same as v5.0). I did not make any test with
>> v4.4, though - actually
>> as far as svt alignment is concerned it should be
>> the same as v5.0. Can
>> you please try and make the same short test with
>> the newest jar with
>> v4.4?
>> This happens to me both with hps-java 5.10 and 5.11
>> (not the most
>> updated one).
>>
>> I would be surprised if it could be something
>> connected to the
>> alignment, unless for some reason new positions and
>> harder tracks
>> trigger some long loops in the reconstruction. But
>> this happens (to me)
>> also with the
>> standard geometry, so a check with the one used
>> with pass0 (that should
>> however be equivalent to v5.0) could at least help
>> to rule out, or blame
>> on, the alignment step.
>> Thanks, cheers
>> Alessandra
>>
>>
>> ps. make also sure that the correct fieldmap is
>> called in all the
>> compact files - you never know!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 May 2017, Rafayel Paremuzyan wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> During the testing the recon for test pass1,
>> I noticed the recon time is more than x2
>> longer wrt pass0
>> recon time.
>>
>> To demonstrate it
>> I submit 3 simple jobs with 10K events to
>> reconstruct, with
>> new pass1 xml
>> file (this has the new jar v051717, and the
>> new detector
>> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-fieldmap_globalAlign),
>> and the old pass0 xml file (pass0 jar release
>> 3.9, and the
>> detector
>> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap)
>>
>> Below is a printout from the jobs with a new
>> JAR, v051717,
>> the average time
>> for 1000 events is more than 7 minutes
>> ===================== LOG from the v051717 JAR
>> ==============================
>> 2017-05-19 09:36:51 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10614074 with sequence 0
>> 2017-05-19 09:43:13 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10615074 with sequence 1000
>> 2017-05-19 09:49:18 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10616074 with sequence 2000
>> 2017-05-19 09:55:54 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10617074 with sequence 3000
>> 2017-05-19 10:02:55 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10618074 with sequence 4000
>> 2017-05-19 10:09:57 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10619074 with sequence 5000
>> 2017-05-19 10:16:13 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10620074 with sequence 6000
>> 2017-05-19 10:25:20 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10621074 with sequence 7000
>> 2017-05-19 10:32:56 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10622074 with sequence 8000
>> 2017-05-19 10:36:19 [WARNING]
>> org.hps.recon.tracking.TrackerReconDriver
>> process :: Discarding track with bad
>> HelicalTrackHit
>> (correction distance
>> 0.000000, chisq penalty 0.000000)
>> 2017-05-19 10:42:03 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10623074 with sequence 9000
>> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO]
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
>> maxEvents 10000
>> was reached
>> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> endOfData ::
>> 10000 events processed in job.
>> 2017-05-19 10:47:44 [INFO]
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
>> Job finished
>> successfully!
>>
>>
>> And below is the Job log info from the pass0
>> jar. The
>> average time for 1000
>> events is less than 3 minutes
>> ===================== LOG from the 3.9
>> release JAR
>> ==============================
>> 2017-05-19 13:19:46 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10614074 with sequence 0
>> 2017-05-19 13:23:36 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10615074 with sequence 1000
>> 2017-05-19 13:27:03 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10616074 with sequence 2000
>> 2017-05-19 13:30:40 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10617074 with sequence 3000
>> 2017-05-19 13:34:20 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10618074 with sequence 4000
>> 2017-05-19 13:38:11 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10619074 with sequence 5000
>> 2017-05-19 13:41:43 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10620074 with sequence 6000
>> 2017-05-19 13:45:54 [WARNING]
>> org.hps.recon.tracking.TrackerReconDriver
>> process :: Discarding track with bad
>> HelicalTrackHit
>> (correction distance
>> 0.000000, chisq penalty 0.000000)
>> 2017-05-19 13:46:05 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10621074 with sequence 7000
>> 2017-05-19 13:50:08 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10622074 with sequence 8000
>> 2017-05-19 13:55:03 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> process :: Event
>> 10623074 with sequence 9000
>> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO]
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
>> maxEvents 10000
>> was reached
>> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO]
>> org.lcsim.job.EventMarkerDriver
>> endOfData ::
>> 10000 events processed in job.
>> 2017-05-19 13:58:27 [INFO]
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio run ::
>> Job finished
>> successfully!
>>
>> I also tried to do reconstruction by myself
>> interactively,
>> but I am getting
>> error below,
>>
>> The command
>> /apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7/bin/java
>> -XX:+UseSerialGC -cp
>> hps-distribution-3.9-bin.jar
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio -x
>> /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim -r -d
>> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-v5-3-fieldmap_globalAlign
>> -R 7796
>> -DoutputFile=out_7796_0
>> hps_007796.evio.0 -n 10000
>>
>> The Error traceback
>> 017-05-19 14:58:44 [CONFIG]
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse ::
>> using steering
>> resource
>> /org/hps/steering/recon/PhysicsRun2016FullRecon.lcsim
>> 2017-05-19 14:58:44 [CONFIG]
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse
>> :: set max events
>> to 10000
>> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG]
>> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager
>> addVariableDefinition :: outputFile = out_7796_0
>> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG]
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio parse
>> :: set steering
>> variable: outputFile=out_7796_0
>> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG]
>> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager
>> initializeLoop
>> :: initializing LCSim loop
>> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [CONFIG]
>> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager
>> initializeLoop
>> :: Event marker printing disabled.
>> 2017-05-19 14:58:45 [INFO]
>> org.hps.conditions.database.DatabaseConditionsManager
>> resetInstance ::
>> DatabaseConditionsManager instance is reset
>> Exception in thread "main"
>> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
>> /u/apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7.0_75/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so:
>> libXext.so.6:
>> cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native
>> Method)
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary1(ClassLoader.java:1965)
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1890)
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1851)
>> at
>> java.lang.Runtime.load0(Runtime.java:795)
>> at
>> java.lang.System.load(System.java:1062)
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native
>> Method)
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary1(ClassLoader.java:1965)
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1890)
>> at
>> java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1872)
>> at
>> java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:849)
>> at
>> java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1088)
>> at
>> sun.security.action.LoadLibraryAction.run(LoadLibraryAction.java:67)
>> at
>> sun.security.action.LoadLibraryAction.run(LoadLibraryAction.java:47)
>> at
>>
>> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>> at
>> java.awt.Toolkit.loadLibraries(Toolkit.java:1653)
>> at
>> java.awt.Toolkit.<clinit>(Toolkit.java:1682)
>> at
>> java.awt.Component.<clinit>(Component.java:595)
>> at
>> org.lcsim.util.aida.AIDA.<init>(AIDA.java:68)
>> at
>> org.lcsim.util.aida.AIDA.defaultInstance(AIDA.java:53)
>> at
>> org.hps.evio.RfFitterDriver.<init>(RfFitterDriver.java:31)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
>> Method)
>>
>> atsun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAcce
>> ssorImpl.java:57)
>>
>> atsun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstru
>> ctorAccessorImpl.java:45)
>> at
>> java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:526)
>> at
>> java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:379)
>> at
>> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager.setupDrivers(JobControlManager.java:1199)
>>
>> at
>> org.hps.job.JobManager.setupDrivers(JobManager.java:82)
>> at
>> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager.setup(JobControlManager.java:1052)
>> at
>> org.lcsim.job.JobControlManager.setup(JobControlManager.java:1110)
>> at
>>
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.parse(EvioToLcio.java:407)
>> at
>> org.hps.evio.EvioToLcio.main(EvioToLcio.java:97)
>>
>>
>>
>> I see this library libXext.so.6: in
>> /usr/lib64, but not in
>> /usr/lib,
>> when I put /usr/lib64 in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH,
>> then it
>> complaines again (see
>> below)
>>
>> Exception in thread "main"
>> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
>> /u/apps/scicomp/java/jdk1.7.0_75/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so:
>> libXext.so.6:
>> wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
>>
>> I would appreciate, if I get some help on
>> running the
>> reconstruction
>> interactively, then I could look more closely
>> into logs
>> of the old, and new JAR files.
>>
>> Rafo
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list,
>> click the
>> following link:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin>
>>
>> _wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu
>>
>> 18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=xnbGP5VHYWRAQRWRksVgMnYvBkXWI4roLxztdJ0Tp9I&s=ppNYedSrn5DP
>>
>> aIZZJgRZu8tBDeSjroqbj_PoevFoFpI&e=
>>
>>
>>
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click
>> the following link:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin>
>>
>> _wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu
>>
>> 18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=xnbGP5VHYWRAQRWRksVgMnYvBkXWI4roLxztdJ0Tp9I&s=ppNYedSrn5DP
>>
>> aIZZJgRZu8tBDeSjroqbj_PoevFoFpI&e=
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the
>> following link:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ########################################################################
>> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the
>> following link:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIDbA&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=nIEvNWJSNxvmECWKfMrVKMTZKNdym3zsAls7WG1fdfU&s=cI82nYRtYBzgLs1l5g3anHrSt0kPk4B98oUzllu5KfQ&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hps-analysis mailing list
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>> <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hps-analysis mailing list
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
>
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwMGaQ&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=yktqxWZIxrOJDj0GcxtXMdIm5S6CzoD5o_bfENc8yOA&s=9UGWhMTkreQfG7iEUol-dsVGExrJm-lRdRBfTmh68jU&e=>
>
>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1
