 |
 |
I agree that there should be some quality flag. We need to be able to update the conditions database for testing without having to worry about unintended repercussions caused by a timestamp. Maybe the "ooh_ooh_pick_me" flag. ________________________________ From: Graham, Mathew Thomas Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 6:38 PM To: McCormick, Jeremy I. Cc: Rafayel Paremuzyan; Graf, Norman A.; Omar Moreno; [log in to unmask]; hps-software Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] Test pass1 Status For the future though we will change the code so it disambiguates overlapping run ranges by using the conditions set that was most recently created. That's the default for most conditions anyways. Nah, I think there should be some sort of pseudo-tag like "best_calibration_constants", so that we don't have to just assume that the last set entered for a run range are the set that should be used. ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1