Good :-)

Regarding packaging, I would say:

  1. We add [log in to unmask] that reserves port 1094 for respective instance. Since it's a systemd socket template it will be generally usable (not just an example). Keep the socket by default disabled.

  2. We can keep the xrdhttp.socket as it is, or make it a socket template too? I don't have a strong opinion on this one. Let me know what you would find better!

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/xrootd/xrootd","title":"xrootd/xrootd","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@simonmichal in #446: Good :-)\r\n\r\nRegarding packaging, I would say:\r\n\r\n1. We add [log in to unmask] that reserves port 1094 for respective instance. Since it's a systemd socket template it will be generally usable (not just an example). Keep the socket by default disabled.\r\n\r\n2. We can keep the xrdhttp.socket as it is, or make it a socket template too? I don't have a strong opinion on this one. Let me know what you would find better!"}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/446#issuecomment-305200235"}}}

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1