 |
 |
This is the confluence page for tpass1c https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=225510613&flashId=-1519521923 let me know, if you have questions/comments Rafo On 06/30/2017 03:17 PM, Rafayel Paremuzyan wrote: > Hello Norman, > > This is the jar file, > /group/hps/hps_soft/hps-java/hps-distribution_vtpass1c_bin.jar > > I will create a summary page on the confluence, and will add necessary > info there. > > Rafo > > > On 06/30/2017 03:06 PM, Graf, Norman A. wrote: >> Hello Rafo, >> >> What jar file are you using? >> >> Norman >> ________________________________________ >> From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> >> on behalf of Rafayel Paremuzyan <[log in to unmask]> >> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 11:56 AM >> To: [log in to unmask]; hps-software >> Subject: test pass status for pass1 >> >> Hi all, >> >> before starting pass1, >> I submitted a new test pass "tpass1c" with 7796 and 8054 (Carbon target) >> >> files are currently being processed, and some of them already have >> finished >> >> Only for this test pass, DQMs were included, but they will not be >> included during the normal pass, for several reasons >> - Nobody actually looked at them at the past, and asking about it in >> several meetings, no one actually requested them to be present >> - They actually require more memory usage than the recon itself, i.e. >> rcon is fine with 2.4Gb (Tot Ram from Auger) and 1.4Gb Heap size, while >> for DQM 1.4 Gb Heap is not enough >> - DQM takes about 30% of recon time, while other staff (DST and skims) >> are much faster >> >> files are in the following directory >> /lustre/expphy/work/hallb/hps/data/physrun2016/tpass1c >> >> Skims and ntuples in terms of file sizes seems fine to me (though users >> need to test them). >> >> I did simple checks of the event timestamps, it seems ok. >> >> So before starting to run the pass1 will be good if users involved in >> the analysis >> to check the data. >> >> At least following points, which are specifically were addressed for >> pass1, >> I think is important to check, and mark as "Good" >> >> - Look into skims, make sure it is not too tight, >> - Check track parameters for detached vertexes >> - Check whether we get the target position close to 0 >> >> If nor issue is found, then probably by the mid of next week I can start >> pass1. >> >> Rafo >> >> ######################################################################## >> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list >> >> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.slac.stanford.edu_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DHPS-2DSOFTWARE-26A-3D1&d=DwIFAw&c=lz9TcOasaINaaC3U7FbMev2lsutwpI4--09aP8Lu18s&r=0HDJrGO9TZQTE97J9Abt2A&m=ixwGSS-UD5P_ZfFwhpG0FCSpClbEXFyAztpj-j_UGNg&s=01sS4n3J7bRgQz-hVzhUwx3OzzcP4SH-Ah_CmZbibQg&e= >> > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1