 |
 |
Hi, I do, and also make my own builds. And I agree that the current naming scheme is a major annoyance, for many reasons that you already mentioned. To keep it simple I would propose to add the HHMM of the build invokation to the date in the rpm filenames. We do this for all our projects since 6 years and it works fine without needing scripts or other hacks. Keeping also the version number in front of the datetime would be a major plus, as right now it is stripped (why !??!) Cheers Fabrizio On 06/03/2017 12:09 PM, Lukasz Janyst wrote: > Michał is on vacation for the next two weeks. > > BTW. It would be interesting to see how many people install release candidates. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/521#issuecomment-305965637>, or mute the > thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD7Yji45OZTtTGKM8U--FL5dSaFtyrzXks5sATDXgaJpZM4NhiTv>. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1