abh3 commented on this pull request.
> - Info(): Add2Q(0), PBack(0), Resp(0), Multi(0), luFast(0), luSlow(0),
- rdFast(0), rdSlow(0) {}
+ Info()
+ {Reset();}
+
+ void Reset()
+ {Add2Q = 0;
+ PBack = 0;
+ Resp = 0;
+ Multi = 0;
+ luFast = 0;
+ luSlow = 0;
+ rdFast = 0;
+ rdSlow = 0;
+ }
+
What is the compiler complaining about here that makes you change all inline initialization to a function call? I am concerned that this structure may defeat compiler optimization.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/657#pullrequestreview-95594184
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
