@abh3 commented on this pull request.
> - Info(): Add2Q(0), PBack(0), Resp(0), Multi(0), luFast(0), luSlow(0), - rdFast(0), rdSlow(0) {} + Info() + {Reset();} + + void Reset() + {Add2Q = 0; + PBack = 0; + Resp = 0; + Multi = 0; + luFast = 0; + luSlow = 0; + rdFast = 0; + rdSlow = 0; + } +
What is the compiler complaining about here that makes you change all inline initialization to a function call? I am concerned that this structure may defeat compiler optimization.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1