 |
 |
Hi Sebastien, Correct, I will do that but they won't differ from what is in XProtocol.hh, so for now use those definitions (the names mentioned in the spec are the same in the hh file). Andy On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Sebastien Binet wrote: > hi there, > > as stated in a previous email of mine, I am trying to setup a pure-Go > client for the XRootD protocol. > > trying to implement a dummy pure-Go server for the protocol (for testing > purposes) I realized the exact values for many (all!) constants > (kXR_DataServer, kXR_LBalServer, kXR_error, kXR_ping, ...) are not > specified in the protocol specifications[1]. > > this prevents from implementing the protocol from first principles. > > could these values be put in the protocol specs? > (or, explicitly state that looking at the header holding them won't be held > as derived work and thus free of LGPL considerations) > > cheers, > -s > > [1] http://xrootd.org/doc/dev45/XRdv310.pdf > > ######################################################################## > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list > > To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1 > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1