 |
 |
I have a question on this patch. My understanding is thet the original intent was to keep the file open as long as possible so that subsequent opens would avoid going through the full open path (i.e. the underlying xrootd reuses open file descriptors). Will this ptach violate that intent? If so, then the solution may be even worse for the common case where each HTTP get requires a full file open operations which is very expensive. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/664#issuecomment-370425290 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1