 |
 |
This is known. We had a light discussion of whether we should do this. For experiment data we should not. But for general purpose cache it seems this is a legitimate request. I think we need to understand how costly it is. I am copying this to [log in to unmask] It is a mailing list dedicated for Xcache and is open for everyone to subscribe. So far it has zero traffic (and spam). regards, -- Wei Yang | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | 650-926-3338(O) From: Andreas-Joachim Peters <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Reply-To: xrootd/xrootd <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 8:16 AM To: xrootd/xrootd <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Cc: Subscribed <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Subject: [xrootd/xrootd] PSS with disk cache enabled doesn't update files changing in the backend (#668) Once a file is cached in xCache, the local copy is never updated even if the inode, size or modification time in the backend has changed. That is very unfortunate. Can this trivial cache eviction policy added? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/668>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE9TA-Kl5qC8kdTptoCOaRiVgNe9C33Mks5teTQ1gaJpZM4Sqn8b>. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/668#issuecomment-373079508 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1