 |
 |
Hello everyone, I do have a question on the XrootD Protocol Reference and I would like to avoid looking at the reference implementation. Since it only has 6 bits, how is the protocol version in `capver`[0] supposed to be formed in comparison to the general `kXR_PROTOCOLVERSION` (e.g. `pval` in kXR_protocol Request) value, which is represented by a 32bit number. For `kXR_PROTOCOLVERSION` I so far assumed a full number, containing major, minor and patch version, so for example Version 3.1.0 gets represented as "310", since this won't work with `capver`, should one only use the major version (e.g. "3"), or even major/minor version (e.g. "31") for that case? Thanks and Best regards, Joel [0]: http://www.xrootd.org/doc/dev45/XRdv310.htm#_Toc464248819 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1