Print

Print


Hello,

I'd like to add the following:

When writing a file, although it fails from the Proxy to the origin (operation not supported), the file still gets written to the local disk cache. However, the file ends up being corrupted.

Any following requests for the same file will be served from the cache, resulting in serving an unreadable file.
Is this the normal/expected behaviour?

Best Regards,
Mihai

-----Original Message-----
From: Fabrizio Furano 
Sent: 02 March 2018 10:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask]; Mihai Patrascoiu <[log in to unmask]>; Matevz Tadel <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Testing the XrdPss with cachelib - Issues with writing

Hi Andy,

 thanks for the hints. My opinion is that a passthrough option would be a very big plus for the caching proxy, and I was sincerely surprised by this limitation.

 For some of our use cases I believe that we will start using it without caching, as I can't imagine how to give a transparent service by having to force clients to use different paths for reading and writing.

 What do you think ?

Thank you
Fabrizio

On 03/01/2018 06:09 PM, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote:
> Correct, we don't support a writable cache because that's not what a 
> cache is all about. Does the origin support writes? If so, we could 
> potentially provide a cache passthrough option. Otherwise, if the 
> readable and writable path differ, he could have run two proxies -- one caching for read access and a passthru proxy for writing then setup a redirect directive in the primary proxy (i.e. the one that will be initially used) to direct writes to the passthru proxy based on path.
> 
> Andy
> 
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Fabrizio Furano wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Mihai is trying to setup a small Pss machine that also works as a cache.
>>
>> For reading it seems to work fine, yet it stubbornly refuses to write 
>> files with this error:
>>
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 XrdFileCache_Manager: debug Cache::Attach()
>>> root:[log in to unmask]:1094//eos/xdc/testing/hello.txt?&oss.
>>> asize=14&oss.lcl=1 location: <deferred open>
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 ofs_fstat:  
>>> fn=/eos/xdc/testing/hello.txt
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 XrootdResponse: 
>>> 0100 sending 46 data bytes; status=0
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 XrootdProtocol: 
>>> 0100 req=write dlen=14
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 XrootdProtocol: 
>>> 0100 fh=0 write 14@0
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 ofs_write: 14@0 
>>> fn=/eos/xdc/testing/hello.txt
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 ofs_write: root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 Unable 
>>> to write /eos/xdc/testing/hello.txt; operation not supported
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 XrootdProtocol: 
>>> 0100 discarding 0 bytes
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 XrootdResponse: 
>>> 0100 sending err 3005: Unable to write /eos/xdc/testing/hello.txt; 
>>> operation not supported
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 XrootdProtocol: 
>>> 0100 req=close dlen=0
>>> 180301 17:27:38 13788 root.3008:20@xdc-test-fst1 ofs_close: use=1 
>>> fn=/eos/xdc/testing/hello.txt
>>
>> If we remove the directive pss.cachelib then writes work instead.
>>
>> Can anyone give us a clue please ?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Fabrizio and Mihai
>>
>>
> 


########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-L&A=1