 |
 |
Hi Paul, So does that mean you did not also write the C++ version? If so, who did? Andy On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Paul Millar wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On 14/06/18 14:42, Andrew Hanushevsky wrote: >> I wouldn't think it should be a problem. Certainly, dCache has a vested >> interest in making this a clean package for maintainability as well as >> making it easily usable to widen the deployment. Paul? > > In general, yes. However, in dCache, we're not depending on libmacaroons. > We're using a pure java implementation instead: jmacaroons. > > Also, in Java it's more common to simply deliver the dependencies with the > application, as jar files, rather than depending on platform-supplied > libraries. > > There's also a central repository of jar files from which dependencies are > pulled during built time, so there's also no need to embed them within the > source-code. > > Cheers, > > Paul. > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1