@abh3 - are you sure it's an EPEL packaging rule? The closest I can see are the `Devel Packages` section here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines. This clearly discourages using an unversioned shared library, but it says nothing against having one module link against another module. Another route, perhaps less-disruptive, would be to load `libXrdHttp.so` from the plugin itself. That'd work here, but would clearly discourage other plug-in writers... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/737#issuecomment-397301096 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1