 |
 |
Good question. It seems sort of useless given that people would rather use checksums to make sure the file is correct. So, I'm leaning toward removing it. Andy On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Sebastien Binet wrote: > great! one less thing to implement from our side :) > (assuming this will be removed from the specs?) > > -- > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/727#issuecomment-395146414 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/727#issuecomment-395162802 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1