Print

Print


Sounds good. The non-physical motions aren’t great, but we should solve that with better process next time if the data looks OK.

Tim

> On Dec 5, 2018, at 11:13 PM, Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Tim,
> 
> I would like to start another test pass tomorrow using the current HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Pass2 detector (#20), generate our canonical physics distributions and make a decision after reviewing those results. 
> 
> Norman
> 
> 
> From: Nelson, Timothy Knight
> Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 11:02 PM
> To: Graf, Norman A.
> Cc: hps-software; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Pass2 Readiness
>  
> Hi Norman,
> 
> What alignment are you going to work with? Do we just go back to #20 now and see what we get?
> 
> Tim
> 
> > On Dec 5, 2018, at 10:56 PM, Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > 
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >  
> > We have now resolved several code issues which were holding up the Pass2 reconstruction and the code has been merged into the git master branch. Thanks to everyone who helped identify and resolve the problems. I encourage everyone to checkout, build and test the latest code snapshot to make sure that what you expect to be in the output is there and correct. All tests should build, run and pass. If not, please post any issues immediately.
> >  
> > We still have a few remaining issues to iron out, but we would like to start the next test pass before the end of the week.
> >  
> > Norman
> > 
> > 
> > Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
> > To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> > https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1


########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1