 |
 |
That's correct. I've been primarily analyzing FEEs, trying to reduce the effects of multiple scattering and also trying to get decent shower development/spread in the ECal to get a good position measurement. Norman -----Original Message----- From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Nelson, Timothy Knight Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 1:30 PM To: Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> Cc: Graf, Norman A. <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]; hps-software <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: ECal-SVT relative alignment Shoot… sorry… Norman’s message said FEEs, not yours. Tim > On Feb 25, 2019, at 12:57 PM, Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > >> On Feb 25, 2019, at 15:38, Nelson, Timothy Knight <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Our data is totally different, especially for FEE, which is what you are looking at here. > > Who’s looking at FEE’s? Maybe you’re looking at different plots? > ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1