 |
 |
> It seems the assumption the two side are compatible is better than assuming the remote side is always IPv6-only. That's for sure the case, IPv6-only is still rare, but dual-stack vs. IPv4-only is pretty common. And I hope that IPv4 only will die out earlier than IPv6 only arises, at least for us this will be true :wink:. Many thanks for the fix and explanation! This would indeed surely be a good backport candidate. While IPv4-only servers are becoming more rare nowadays, our example shows they still exist. In case people are curious (that's now of course off-topic!): Our main blocker preventing IPv6 introduction is a controllable DHCPv6 workflow. Many clients don't play well with DHCPv6 (e.g. client-id changing especially when installing a machine via PXE) and we don't want to go down the routes of full autoconfiguration or full static configuration (both would be easy in straightforward, but come at a price). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/968#issuecomment-484677398 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1