 |
 |
Hi Elvin, Indeed, this has been done for R5. Adding in a proper way breaks ABI. That's why we waited until R5 to do so. Look at XrdSecEntity::pros. Andy On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Elvin Sindrilaru wrote: > Some OFS plugin implementations i.e. EOS rely on the type of protocol the access is being done to properly redirect the clients to different storage nodes and ports. When a requests comes from XrdHttp the protocol information is missing from the XrdSecEntity.prot filed. This is present however in the tident fields but this looks like a hack and misleading since the tident info is totally different when access is done through the XRootD protocol. > > Could this info be added to the XrdSecEntity object? > > Thanks, > Elvin > > -- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122#issuecomment-577291954 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1