Hi Elvin,
Indeed, this has been done for R5. Adding in a proper way breaks ABI.
That's why we waited until R5 to do so. Look at XrdSecEntity::pros.
Andy
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Elvin Sindrilaru wrote:
> Some OFS plugin implementations i.e. EOS rely on the type of protocol the access is being done to properly redirect the clients to different storage nodes and ports. When a requests comes from XrdHttp the protocol information is missing from the XrdSecEntity.prot filed. This is present however in the tident fields but this looks like a hack and misleading since the tident info is totally different when access is done through the XRootD protocol.
>
> Could this info be added to the XrdSecEntity object?
>
> Thanks,
> Elvin
>
> --
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AA7NRDXCLQFC5BNQS6DOMTDQ7B5T7A5CNFSM4KKDDFS2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJUMNMQ#issuecomment-577291954",
"url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AA7NRDXCLQFC5BNQS6DOMTDQ7B5T7A5CNFSM4KKDDFS2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJUMNMQ#issuecomment-577291954",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1