Hi Elvin,

Indeed, this has been done for R5. Adding in a proper way breaks ABI.
That's why we waited until R5 to do so. Look at XrdSecEntity::pros.

Andy

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Elvin Sindrilaru wrote:

> Some OFS plugin implementations i.e. EOS rely on the type of protocol the access is being done to properly redirect the clients to different storage nodes and ports. When a requests comes from XrdHttp the protocol information is missing from the XrdSecEntity.prot filed. This is present however in the tident fields but this looks like a hack and misleading since the tident info is totally different when access is done through the XRootD protocol.
>
> Could this info be added to the XrdSecEntity object?
>
> Thanks,
> Elvin
>
> --
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AA7NRDXCLQFC5BNQS6DOMTDQ7B5T7A5CNFSM4KKDDFS2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJUMNMQ#issuecomment-577291954", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1122?email_source=notifications\u0026email_token=AA7NRDXCLQFC5BNQS6DOMTDQ7B5T7A5CNFSM4KKDDFS2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJUMNMQ#issuecomment-577291954", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1