Yes, I agree that 1159 is much cleaner. BTW you know that the pointer will be zero if authorization was not enabled. So, you may want to rethink how to handle that. I suppose I should have added yet another envar to tell you that. Is not configuring authorization something that is acceptable to the Macaroon support? As for a work around, I'm looking for suggestions. I guess you need the stacking framework to make it all workable, right? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1147#issuecomment-601511908 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1