Yes, I agree that 1159 is much cleaner. BTW you know that the pointer will be zero if authorization was not enabled. So, you may want to rethink how to handle that. I suppose I should have added yet another envar to tell you that. Is not configuring authorization something that is acceptable to the Macaroon support? As for a work around, I'm looking for suggestions. I guess you need the stacking framework to make it all workable, right?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1147#issuecomment-601511908", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1147#issuecomment-601511908", "name": "View Pull Request" }, "description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1