 |
 |
@djw8605 - don't forget that the GSI authentication protocol for Xrootd _only_ works with proxies. It does not work with 'normal' client certificates and does not have the concept of anonymous sessions. @abh3 - is it possible to mix GSI auth'n and Unix auth'n when using the built-in authorization file mechanism? IIRC, there's no way to provide authorizations based upon the authentication protocol. That is, if I wanted to provide an authorization line like this: ``` g /cms /store a ``` is it possible that this only matches groups coming from GSI authentication but _not_ Unix authentication? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1188#issuecomment-623792480 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1