@djw8605 - don't forget that the GSI authentication protocol for Xrootd only works with proxies. It does not work with 'normal' client certificates and does not have the concept of anonymous sessions.

@abh3 - is it possible to mix GSI auth'n and Unix auth'n when using the built-in authorization file mechanism? IIRC, there's no way to provide authorizations based upon the authentication protocol. That is, if I wanted to provide an authorization line like this:

g /cms /store a

is it possible that this only matches groups coming from GSI authentication but not Unix authentication?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1188#issuecomment-623792480", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1188#issuecomment-623792480", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1