 |
 |
Hi Justas, So, would this work for you? For a server you simply specify the IP address to use for the data channels. The server will simply redirect the client to use that IP address for each data channel it creates. Now, that does mean that the client needs to be able to connect using that IP address. At the moment, I don't see any way of verifying that would be true in the general case but I'll work on that part. Andy On Tue, 19 May 2020, Justas Bal?as wrote: > Brian - 1 - yes, routing is not an option for most cases. 2 - yes, GridFTP will always keep routing data via private, while auth and 3rd party client keeps getting transfer stat updates via public. (For me - yes, acceptable. Maybe there are more use cases?) > > Andrew - If hosts behind NAT, not an issue, then yes - the host making a connection to the control channel will be the same asking for data channel. > For DNS - Usually no, there are no entries in DNS of our servers - So it will not resolve. > > -- > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1192#issuecomment-630887924 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1192#issuecomment-631031936 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1