 |
 |
Actually, I think I'm going to close this one for now. Here's my thinking: 1. Derek and I have a pretty narrow use case which requires us to support tokens in V4. That's generally not a safe thing to do, hence I don't feel bad keeping this out-of-tree. 2. For V5, we don't need backward compatibility since TLS mode itself isn't backward compatible. In such a case, we can just do a completely new `anon` and/or `token` plugin. Toward the latter - the experiments we are doing now are hopefully going to inform what's needed for a `token` plugin. We're currently faking the client parts via an `XrdCl` plugin. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1195#issuecomment-631228631 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1