Actually, I think I'm going to close this one for now. Here's my thinking:
- Derek and I have a pretty narrow use case which requires us to support tokens in V4. That's generally not a safe thing to do, hence I don't feel bad keeping this out-of-tree.
- For V5, we don't need backward compatibility since TLS mode itself isn't backward compatible. In such a case, we can just do a completely new
anon and/or token plugin.
Toward the latter - the experiments we are doing now are hopefully going to inform what's needed for a token plugin. We're currently faking the client parts via an XrdCl plugin.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1195#issuecomment-631228631",
"url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1195#issuecomment-631228631",
"name": "View Pull Request"
},
"description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
