Actually, with the R5 SSI the fuse client should be passing the actual
uid/gid which makes the whole thing much simpler. There isn't any code
changes required to do that just configuring SSI to pass along the
information.
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, Brian P Bockelman wrote:
> I recall the plugin was waiting on some feature of XRootD V5 that would make it simpler -- although honestly I can't recall what that was.
>
> Anyhow, it's been running well at a few sites over the past few years. Looking at the code, there's a few opportunities for cleanup.
>
> That said, it's not clear if this would fix the original problem? Looks like the original problem was that `xrootd-fuse` wasn't passing along the username from the client to the server itself.
>
> --
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1219#issuecomment-646844566
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1219#issuecomment-646852559",
"url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1219#issuecomment-646852559",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1