Correct! That's what has to get fixed. However, there is no point in doing
this if the majority of a vector read hits individual pages. We need to
understand the vector read before deciding where to apply limited effort.

Enabling AIO would do nothing as Ceph AIO reverts to synchrnous I/O.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Matev? Tadel wrote:

> Thanks! The problem is that XrdCephOssFile does not implement ReadV at all and so it gets serialized at the parent class level, right?
>
> Also, Read() always calls ceph_posix_pread() which only handles one block at a time and so requires two calls if the request is straddling two ceph blocks.
>
> Would enabling AIO help here? It seems to be implemented there.
>
>
>
> --
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1259#issuecomment-671535681


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1259#issuecomment-671537896", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1259#issuecomment-671537896", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1