Print

Print


@abh3 i can confirm that now the servers appear to be subscribed to the redirector.  while is strange that it used to work and now no longer works, in hindsight, i could just protect the declaration in the same fashion that i do it just below for http part.
At this point, to close the ticket, i would like to know is this (commented) declaration is required, when could/should be required and how safe for the xrootd + http usage is to be removed.
Thanks a lot!!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1356#issuecomment-747344639

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1