Print

Print

So, looking at what we can leverage, returning all of the checksums would be rather expensive and not necessarily complete. If we follow the current "query chksum" approach then the default is to return default chksum if a specific one was not specified. If a specific one was specified, then it must be one of the declared types. Hence, only one checksum can be returned using this approach. Returning all of them would be expensive as one would have to probe for each declared type and virtually all the of the time files in a single directory have only one of the declared types. This is due to experiments using different checksums for their files and those files don't overlap other experiment's files. So, is the the current single checksum approach sufficient (I hope so)?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1372#issuecomment-754853246", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1372#issuecomment-754853246", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1