 |
 |
Actually, for consistency, the cadir/cafile really needs to be coordinated with the cadir and cafile in xrd.tls directive otherwise we are just getting a lot of confusion. Let's think about how we go about doing that! On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Elvin Sindrilaru wrote: > Looks good for my side. Maybe one though would be not to mix http cadir/cafile directives with the ones used by TPC curl, since I guess the vanilla http part still needs the cadir to point to something relevant. Also another thought would be to maybe honour the **(XRDTPC_)CURLOPT_CAPATH/CURLOPT_CAFILE** env variables if they are present in the env - like this it's easier to control the TCP behavior without messing up to much with HTTP part. > > -- > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1431#issuecomment-801899835 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1431#issuecomment-802231727 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1