Print

Print


Because we decided a long time ago to keep positive as well as negative 
entries in the cache as apps that were issuing repetitive requests could 
do either negative or positive operations (not a great explanation but 
one that tries to capture that the issue was on both sides of the fence). 
Atleast that's what I recall as we did that a very long time ago.

On Fri, 11 Jun 2021, Brian P Bockelman wrote:

> I don't think it's incompatible with HTTP -- it's simply having problems with the sequence of operations FTS is performing.  I believe they are something like this:
>
> ```
> mkdir /foo/bar/baz # error - does not exist
> mkdir /foo/bar # success
> mkdir /foo/bar/baz # success
> stat /foo/bar/baz # FAIL: the prior mkdir failed with "does not exist"
> ```
>
> Actually - @abh3, why doesn't the `mkdir` invalidate the negative cache entry in this case?
>
> -- 
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1466#issuecomment-859980522


-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1466#issuecomment-859981689

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1