Print

Print


I agree, this would be a good time actually.

> On Aug 31, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> If no one is running now I’d say go for it.  
> 
>> On Aug 31, 2021, at 12:03 PM, Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> Scicomp is ready to move HPS to a new /work (not the one in the counting house) fileserver with increased performance and space.
>> 
>> This will require switching it to read-only for a final rsync and then the switch will happen.  That should take a total of 30 minutes, and meanwhile people/jobs trying to write to /work/hallb/hps will have problems.
>> 
>> I don't see anything currently on the batch farm for HPS.  I'm tempted to let them go forward with this ASAP unless people yell.  Not an ideal time for this, but I requested they do HPS first since we have most to benefit for the upcoming run.
>> 
>> -Nathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hps-analysis mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
> 
> 
> ########################################################################
> Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
> 
> To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1