Print

Print


Hi @ijjorama,

It seems some sort of issue concerning RAL ought to be raised concerning this problem, even though it can be provisionally fixed by increasing the chunk size the dCache client uses to match the chunk size used by the native xrootd client.   

While that change will make our users happy for the moment, it does not address the underlying issues:

(a)  why does the RAL server send the extra bytes?
(b)  why does **_increasing_** the request size (instead of decreasing it) solve this problem?

Al

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1454#issuecomment-894307211

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1