I think what Paul is asking for it for xrdcp to issue full-sized reads and trim after the fact so that it issue a warning. Right Paul? Andy On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, simonmichal wrote: > Hi @paulmillar > > Sticking to your example, in case of `xrdcp` the third read request won't be for 4MB. Since the file is 9MB big and we already requested 8MB (2x 4MB chunk), `xrdcp` will trim the size of the 3rd chunk to 1MB. What I mean here is that `xrdcp` will send a request for 1MB of data (and not trim the data it received from the server). That's why, `xrdcp` never sees the extra data that RAL/Ceph is sending. > > -- > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1492#issuecomment-895996461 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1492#issuecomment-896223684 ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1