 |
 |
The 10x larger test is done at /volatile/hallb/hps/baltzell/trigtest3 -Nathan > On Nov 29, 2021, at 2:52 PM, Nathan Baltzell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hello All, > > Before running over the entire 2021 data set, I ran some test jobs using Maurik’s EVIO trigger bit skimmer. Here’s the fraction of events kept in 14750 for each skim: > > fee 2.0% > moll 3.3% > muon 1.9% > rndm 2.9% > > In each case, it’s inclusive of all such types, e.g., moll=moll+moll_pde+moll_pair, rndm=fcup+pulser. > > Are those numbers in line with expectations? The total is 10% and not a problem if these skims are expected to be useful. The outputs are at /volatile/hallb/hps/baltzell/trigtest2 if people are interested to check things. > > A 10x larger test is running now and going to /volatile/hallb/hps/baltzell/trigtest3 and should be done in the next couple hours. > > ************ > > Note, it would be prudent to do this *only* for production runs, those that would be used in physics analysis, to avoid unnecessary tape access. By that I mean removing junk runs, keeping only those with some significant number of events, and only keeping those with physics trigger settings (not special runs). For that we need a run list. I think we have close to a PB, but I remember hearing at the collaboration meeting that at least 20% is not useful for the porpoises of trigger bit skimming. > > -Nathan_______________________________________________ > Hps-analysis mailing list > [log in to unmask] > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the HPS-SOFTWARE list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=HPS-SOFTWARE&A=1