Print

Print

No, it is precisely what I thought we were not supposed to do. Perhaps I misunderstood the discussion I had with @abh3 but the ZTN token is considered a "throw away" ... that the authorization token which appears as the opaque 'authz=' value needs to be there. I remember this because I originally implemented authorization to fallback on the ZTN token if there is no authz= and then changed it. Obviously, if the fallback is what we want, I can reimplement.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: <xrootd/xrootd/issues/1584/1034948218@github.com>

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1584#issuecomment-1034948218", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1584#issuecomment-1034948218", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1