Print

Print


@olifre - coming back to this.

Can you please share your partial fix via a PR?  I'd like to see it go in simply because it iterates us toward a better implementation.

We've found there's a number of places where HTTP-style operations or WLCG token authorization maps poorly to POSIX.  Where we can, we aim for practical solutions.  I could see where we might need to do something that has a race condition (e.g., check for file existence then create a file) but is "mostly correct".

@abh3 - to some extent, the WLCG token authorizations are _more_ fine grained than what's in XRootD.  What are your thoughts on adding two new finer-grained authorization levels in XRootD?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1655#issuecomment-1114051565
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <[log in to unmask]>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1