Print

Print


@olifre - looked a bit at this this morning. A WLCG token will additionally provide explicit create / modify authorization. So, we should be able to implement logic around the lines of:

  1. When examining authorizations in the loop, add the appropriate permissions for create & modify.
  2. If write is encountered, note this but do not generate new permissions for that.
  3. Once the loop has completed, if we saw only write but neither create nor modify then we have encountered a SciToken and add back in all write permissions.

That should handle the WLCG case correctly and make the compliance tests happy. Right?

Brian


Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <xrootd/xrootd/issues/1655/1090414328@github.com>

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1655#issuecomment-1090414328", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1655#issuecomment-1090414328", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1